Virtual Reality vs. Traditional Training
VR training is not meant to replace traditional training options, such as eLearning or hands-on training. Rather, VR training complements them. By using traditional and VR training, laboratories can create a comprehensive and effective training program that enhances learner engagement, promotes practical application of knowledge, provides realistic experiences, and delivers measurable training outcomes.
Here are some examples of how VR training can complement your traditional laboratory training options:
Hands-On Training
Traditional laboratory training often involves instructor-led lectures and procedure-oriented training. VR can supplement these activities with virtual hands-on experiences in a realistic environment, enhancing the level of immersion and engagement. Learners can safely practice their skills in a virtual laboratory, reinforcing what they’ve learned through traditional training methods without the need to work in, then decontaminate active laboratories, or use valuable supplies.
Remote Training and Accessibility
Traditional training options may face limitations when learners are in remote or inaccessible locations. VR training overcomes these challenges by allowing learners in different geographic areas to access virtual training scenarios at the same time.
Preparing for Real World Scenarios
Traditional training methods often focus on theory and hypothetical scenarios. VR training bridges the gap between theory and real-world application by immersing trainees in realistic, simulated environments where they can practice and develop their skills.
Assessment and Feedback
While traditional training methods often rely on post-training assessments or evaluations, VR training offers real-time assessment. Trainers can observe learners’ performance within the virtual environment, provide immediate feedback, and track progress.